Hoopla
The first paragraph is exemplary of all this “weakness” nonsense. Note the phrase in which it’s pointed out that Ignatieff “allowed” a “rebellion.” Is that even possible? You want me to grab a dictionary?
He doesn’t like the budget but he can’t oppose the budget and now he gets to…. have his cake and eat it, so to speak. All this business just confirms that things just… work out for Iggy. That, and Newfoundland Liberals are all troublemakers. I mean, how much noise can you make before the rest of the country gets fed up? (A lot… I don’t think anyone’s really listening.)
And I don’t think it’s helping anyone’s case, except Ignatieff’s, to say “this never even happened with Dion and this would never happen with Harper.” Who likes/liked those guys anyways? Isn’t the whole point that Ignatieff is different?
Furthermore, might we have more fluid parametres to what a “good leader” is than “hard ass who lays down the law?”
Tags: Ignatieff
